Fraud Lawyers Edmonton | Theft Under $5000 | Theft Over $5000

Theft under the Criminal Code of Canada is defined as unlawfully taking property, while fraud is defined as using deceit, falsehood, or other fraudulent means to obtain property, money, or services.

Shoplifting, theft, and fraud are all serious charges that can result in a criminal record as well as fines, probation, or even time in prison.

Charges Related to Theft and Fraud

The area of theft and fraud law includes the following possible charges:

Identity theft
Forged or counterfeited documents
Break and enter
Theft from an employer
Shoplifting

Punishment for Theft and Fraud

Theft or fraud under $5,000 carries a maximum sentence of two years imprisonment. Theft over $5,000 carries a maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment, while fraud over $,5000 carries a maximum sentence of 14 years imprisonment.

For jail sentences, , the length of the sentence depends on various aggravating factors such as the amount stolen, the degree of planning involved, whether the perpetrator abused a position of trust, the number of victims and the impact on their personal circumstances, and the destroying or concealing of papers or evidence.

I’ve Been Charged With Theft/Fraud. What Do I Do Now?

A theft or fraud conviction will result in a criminal record, causing long-term consequences. Get experienced advice at every stage from DDSG Criminal Law. Call our team today.

Frequently Asked Questions About Theft and Fraud Charges in Edmonton

In Alberta, there is a program called the Alternative Measures Program that can assist you in getting your charges dropped for minor thefts, such as shoplifting, as long as you don’t have a previous record.

When it comes to theft charges, the Crown Prosecutor must prove that you took property from the lawful owner with the intent of depriving them of that property. Therefore, you cannot be convicted of theft without this evidence.

Some common defences to fraud include arguing that you did not intend to commit fraud or by establishing there was no loss or risk of loss to the complainant. However, the defence of lack of intent to commit fraud may not succeed if the perpetrator was reckless or wilfully blind to the alleged fraudulent conduct.

You can also argue that the evidence against you was gathered in a manner that violated your Charter rights and should be excluded.

As fraud cases typically take a lot of time and effort to put together by the Crown Prosecutor and police, there is a possibility that an offer to pay back the money or value of the property (also known as “restitution”) can result in an agreement to withdraw the charges. It can also be a factor that the judge may consider when imposing a sentence upon conviction.